22 Mart 2008 Cumartesi

Weekend in Missoula ; Montana

Weekend in Missoula ; Montana

Hundreds of miles of trails weave in and around Missoula. Missoula is located in a deep valley surrounded by mountains and is cut by three major rivers, the Clark Fork River, the Bitterroot River and the Blackfoot River. The city is the namesake and center of the large, ancient Glacial Lake Missoula The 61,000-acre (24-686 hectare) Rattlesnake National Recreation and Wilderness Area is five miles (8 kilometers) away and the Montana Snowbowl resort, nine miles (14 kilometers) from town.

This year Brennan’s Wave white-water park opened on the stretch of the mighty Clark Fork River that passes through town, allowing kayakers to show off alongside eclectic bistros and bars. For stunning views of the Missoula Valley, hike or bike the challenging path to 7,971-foot (2,430-kilometer) Stuart Peak. So come to this haven of four major mountain ranges , numerous trout-laden streams and an adventure mindset.

Via: National Geographic

High of Smoky Mountain

High of Smoky Mountain

The Great Smoky Mountains National Park is a United States National Park that includes the ridgeline of the Great Smoky Mountains and a part of the Blue Ridge Mountains which are a part of the larger chain. It offers undulating ridges, forested valleys, and tumbling streams.

The true beauty of the park lies in one key detail: 80 inches (203 centimeters) of rain a year. The flow feeds primeval hardwood forests and innumerable creeks that tumble down hazy mountainsides.

1) The Alum Cave Trail of Mount Le Conte is the most popular of the five paths that lead to the summit of the mountain.

2) Another popular hiking trail leads up to the pinnacle of the Chimney Top mountains.

3)The Laurel Falls and Cling man’s Dome trails offer relatively easy, short, paved paths.

After hiking and simple sightseeing, fishing is the most popular activity in the national park, although there are strict regulations under which fishing must be conducted. Horseback riding , bicycling is all also available within the park.

Image:Q.T.Luong

Via: Wikipedia

Rhode island

Rhode island

Some of the most scenic views can be seen above the cliffs in Narragansett Bay within Beavertail State Park, located on the southernmost tip of Conanicut Island near Jamestown. It is situated in between Newport and Rhode Island’s west bay along the New England coastline. The park attracts people from all over, to enjoy its pristine environment and panoramic views. Beavertail offers a spectacular view of the Ocean State’s coastline where Narragansett Bay meets the Atlantic.

Larry Price says:

Whether it’s adventurously sitting on the cliffs, sunbathing on the rocks below, or just viewing from your car at one of four overlooks, the vista stirs the soul and quiets the mind.

The 170-acre state park also offers hiking and biking trails, saltwater fishing, and a naturalist program. Rhode islands often called the Ocean State, offers one an extensive shoreline waiting to be explored.

Via: CNN

Argentina Court Probes Minister on Arms Sales

Argentina Court Probes Minister on Arms Sales

An Argentine judge has ordered Defense Minister Nilda Garre to be questioned over possible tax evasion in government weapons sales, in the latest corruption probe before October’s general election.
Garre said on Thursday she was not involved in any wrongdoing and called the court order politically motivated.
News of the summons came three days after Felisa Miceli was forced to resign as economy minister over an inquiry into some $60,000 found in a bag in her office.
In the arms case, a court is investigating whether a state-run company sold rifle parts to a U.S. company at prices well below the market rate. La Nacion newspaper reported the small, Connecticut-based company was owned by an Argentine.
The judge leading the probe is looking into allegations the weapons parts were undervalued to avoid customs taxes.
“I was summoned in writing to give information or evidence that I believe could help clarify the case,” Garre told reporters. “I don’t know what reasons the judge might have had, but anyone … can see that the Defense Ministry’s potential responsibility is completely overblown.”
The investigation garnered attention on the same day that the first lady, Sen. Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, was due to launch her presidential campaign.
Argentina’s election, scheduled for Oct. 28, is also for some provincial governors, legislators and other posts.
In May, President Nestor Kirchner fired two midlevel officials over alleged corruption on a government pipeline project. Another public works official resigned.
Earlier this month, Kirchner’s Cabinet chief was forced to publicly defend the environment secretary after a newspaper investigation accused her of hiring relatives and spending lavish amounts of government money.
Kirchner still enjoys high approval ratings despite the investigations and an unrelated energy crisis.
“We are in an electoral campaign, and it seems that some people believe any means can be used efficiently to sully a campaign that should be carried out with normality and respect,” Garre said.

Oboronprom Takes Control of Russia’s Mil Helicopter Plant

Oboronprom Takes Control of Russia’s Mil Helicopter Plant

Russian state-controlled Oboronprom, the core company in the government-led consolidation of the national helicopter industry, announced July 12 it has taken majority ownership of Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant.
A subsidiary of Rosoboronexport, the state arms-trading monopoly, Oboronprom has acquired 25.07 percent of Mil from the Russian Abilis Holdings, according to an Oboronprom press release. Oboronprom already owned 36.35 percent of the Mil plant. Neither company would disclose the amount paid by Oboronprom.
The remaining shares of the Mil plant are spread among U.S. company Sikorsky International Operations (9.39 percent), Russian companies Energia (5.58 percent) and Pentapol (5.11 percent) and more than 4,600 private shareholders.
Created in 2002 and designated in a 2004 decree by President Vladimir Putin as the vehicle for consolidation of Russia’s helicopter-making industry, Oboronprom already controls the Ulan-Ude aviation plant, Vperyod Moscow machine-building plant and Stupino machine-building industrial enterprise.
By the end of 2007, Oboronprom plans to consolidate a controlling stake in two other helicopter producers:
• The Kazan aviation plant. Oboronprom now owns 29.92 percent, while Rosoboronexport has 21 percent. Russia’s TFK company, which is 50 percent-owned by the Kazan Helicopter Plant, holds 11.41 percent, with the remainder spread among more than 10,000 shareholders, including the government of Tatarstan.
• The Kamov plant. Oboronprom currently owns 49.46 percent in Kamov, while the state-owned MiG Corp. manages 49.64 percent.
By early 2008, Oboronprom plans to acquire a blocking stake in the Rostvertol helicopter plant, in which it currently owns 4.22 percent, while the governmental Federal Property Agency owns 3.44 percent. Forty-eight percent of Rostvertol’s shares are floated, and the remaining shares are owned by the company’s management.
In 2006, the enterprises that are slated to become part of the Russian helicopter-production holding rolled out 110 helicopters, earning more than $1.1 billion, according to Oboronprom.

US troubles in landing Turkish defense contracts set to continue

US troubles in landing Turkish defense contracts set to continue

During a March 15 hearing in Congress, a senior Pentagon official criticized Ankara’s defense acquisition policies in unusually candid language, saying the present approach by the Turkish procurement agency “is hindering Turkey’s military modernization, interoperability with NATO allies and U.S.-Turkey defense industry cooperation.”"Onerous terms and conditions – liability, work share, technology transfer, and upfront U.S. government approval requirements in Turkey’s standard contracts – have kept U.S. firms from bidding,” Dan Fata, deputy assistant secretary of defense for Europe and NATO, told the hearing on U.S.-Turkish relations at the House of Representatives’ Committee on Foreign Affairs.Since then, U.S. concerns voiced by Fata have remained in place, with Ankara selecting non-U.S. suppliers in three critical programs altogether worth billions of dollars over a decade. And the future does not look bright for potential American commercial sales to Turkey.To avoid misunderstandings in evaluating the current status of Turkish-U.S. defense industry relations, the relationship’s foundations should be first analyzed correctly. It is a two-fold relationship: First, Turkey’s government-to-government purchases from the United States, based on a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) mechanism; and second, commercial sales in which US companies usually have to compete against rivals from other countries. It is the second category where the Americans face problems.The United States has been Turkey’s closest Western partner and largest weapons supplier in modern times. Each year Turkey buys defense equipment worth more than $1 billion from the United States on the FMS scheme. FMS loans are U.S. government credits designed to enable allied nations to buy U.S. defense equipment.And such government-to-government weapons sales will continue to flourish, with Turkey set to buy new aircraft and related fighter services worth nearly $15 billion over the next 10 to 15 years.

Lucrative FMS deals:

Those deals include a Turkish plan to buy 100 next generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets worth $10.7 billion; an agreement for the sale to the Turkish Air Force of 30 F-16 Block 50 fighters worth $1.85 billion; and an ongoing modernization of older Turkish F-16s for $1.1 billion. In all these cases, U.S. Lockheed Martin is the prime contractor.

In addition, Turkey continually buys various types of Air Force and naval missiles and other related services under FMS deals with the United States.Now back to commercial programs. In the 2000s, U.S. companies have managed to secure only two major direct commercial sales: First a nearly $1.6 billion contract with Boeing in 2002 for four airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft (which is faltering, bythe way, with huge delivery delays because of Boeing’s bad planning); and a $580 million agreement with Sikorsky Aircraft last year for 17 S-70B Seahawk naval warfare helicopters. Sikorsky is the only major U.S. survivor in the rocky Turkish defense market in terms of commercial sales.But in major commercial deal decisions over the past few months only, the Turkish government and military opted for non-U.S. solutions for attack helicopters, training aircraft and a model for main battle tanks.Earlier this year, the Defense Industry Executive Committee, Turkey’s top decision-making body on defense procurement whose members include the prime minister, the chief of the general staff and the defense minister, selected the Italian-British AgustaWestland, maker of the A-129 Mangusta International, over South African rivals. The program is estimated to cost $2.7 billion for 90 platforms.And in late June the Executive Committee opted for South Korean solutions for the tank and trainer aircraft programs.The trainer aircraft program is worth about $450 million and involves up to 54 platforms. Ankara awarded the deal to Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI), maker of the KT-1 Woongbi, which beat the Super Tucano from Brazil’s Embraer.

US faltering in commercial sales:

On the tank program, South Korea’s XK-2 platform, developed by the Agency for Defense Development, was chosen as the model on which Turkey’s new main battle tank would be based.Turkish officials said that the fresh business for Korean companies may easily exceed $1 billion as the tank program would most likely involve several follow-on contracts. U.S. companies were non-players in these three competitions. Boeing, maker of the U.S. Army’s AH-64D Apache Longbow, and Bell Helicopter Textron, maker of the U.S. Marine Command’s AH-1Z, could not bid for the attack helicopter contract, and Raytheon failed to take part in the trainer aircraft competition, all blaming the Undersecretariat for Defense Industries (SSM), Turkey’s procurement agency, for drafting strict terms and conditions for program specifications, which they said were incompatible with U.S. export laws and regulations.And two years ago, U.S. General Atomics lost a major contract on Turkish unmanned aerial vehicles to the Israeli Aircraft Industries.The target of criticism by Pentagon’s Fata, other officials and U.S. companies, SSM rejects the charges. SSM chief Murad Bayar says his undersecretariat has greatly softened its terms and conditions to enable U.S. participation in Turkish programs, but American officials say the changes in Turkish specifications are cosmetic and not sufficient for their participation.”We have done what we can. Other countries do not have such complaints, and can easily bid for our programs,” countered one SSM official.

Undeclared policy?

“The Turks are sick and tired of the United States’ notorious restrictions on technology transfer and strict rules of export, which have caused so many problems for Turkey in past years,” said one Turkish defense analyst. “So in a kind of undeclared policy, the Turks are now selecting non-U.S. suppliers whenever they can, to avoid hassle with the Americans.

They are effectively saying, ‘OK, if I can buy this system from this or that country, why should I beg you?’”SSM is happy with the Ankara government’s selections in the recent commercial sale programs, and has no plans to further soften its rules to meet U.S. demands for many future programs. That means the United States may have no chance to sell defense systems that arealso offered by companies from other countries meeting Turkish requirements, the analyst said.But there are exceptions. For future commercial sales, U.S. military helicopters appear to be items that Turkey likely will continue to buy. For example, in ongoing competition between U.S. and European companies for 32 military utility helicopters worth more than $500 million, Ankara is expected to buy versions of Sikorsky’s S-70 Black Hawk, continuing its tradition for this platform.Also Turkey in the longer term plans to buy up to 10 heavy lift helicopters, and Boeing’s CH-47 Chinook has emerged as the strongest candidate.

Except for the United States and Russia, no other country manufactures heavy lift helicopters, and Russian equipment is incompatible with Turkey’s NATO-based systems.In another example, the Raytheon/Lockheed group, maker of the Patriot PAC-3 systems, is expected to compete with Russian rivals marketing the S-300 or S-400 systems for Turkey’s $1.3 billion program for anti-missile air defense systems. For the Russian option there is a compatibility problem, but Greece, another NATO member, has been operating the S-300s.So in the foreseeable future, Turkey will continue to buy U.S. systems when it specifically needs them, but may opt for other solutions whenever it can, as seen in several recent examples.

Australia, US concerned over China’s military buildup

Australia, US concerned over China’s military buildup

Australia and a top U.S. military official expressed concern Thursday that China’s rapid military buildup and use of a missile in space could

add to instability in the Asia-Pacific, and backed a greater role for Japan in regional security.

Releasing his government’s first defense policy update since 2005, Prime Minister John Howard said China’s economic rise was good for the world, but added a caution

that it was also a pivotal player in several tense issues in the region.

“The pace and scope of its military modernization, particularly the development of new and disruptive capabilities such as the anti-satellite missile, could create misunderstandings and instability in the region,” the policy report said.

The policy brings Canberra closely into line with Washington, which has expressed similar concerns about China’s military expansion. The two are already close allies, with a defense pact and Australian contributions to U.S.-led operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Separately Thursday, the commander of the United States’ Japan-based naval battle group voiced Washington’s concern about China rapid military expansion.

“Certainly we are a bit wary of China,” Rear Adm. Rick Wren, the commander of the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk’s battle group, told The Associated Press. “They seem

to be fairly opaque in communicating what they intend to do with this large military buildup.”

Wren, speaking aboard the carrier as it came into Sydney Harbor for a port visit, said the United States wants China to become a stabilizing force in Asia.

“Certainly we need them to be a stabilizing force in this region,” he said. “But until we can actually define that, we will continue to practice our skills and be ready for

whatever the president calls on us to do.”

More than 5,000 U.S. sailors were due to take shore leave in Sydney after completing the Talisman Saber exercises, a biennial event that this year pitted 20,000 U.S. troops and

7,500 Australian forces and dozens of ships and planes against fictional enemies in a variety of land and sea-based scenarios off Australia’s northeastern coast.

Japan took part in the Talisman Saber exercises as an observer, and Wren said Japan would take a “much bigger” role in future exercises. He did not elaborate.

“The importance of multilateral alliance in this theater is very important,” Wren said. “What we both want to do is expand that in the interest of creating a stronger and

long-lasting regional stability, and so we are bringing in many other nations.”

Cooperation could include non-combat roles such as disaster relief and other humanitarian operations, he said.

The Australian policy document said cooperation between Australia, Japan and the United States would become increasingly important in maintaining stability in Asia,

and noted “Australia has no closer nor more valuable partner in the region than Japan.”

“Japan’s more active security posture within the U.S. alliance and multinational coalitions is in keeping with its economic and diplomatic weight,” it said.

Howard said China’s economic rise was good for the world, but that “U.S.-China relations, China-Japan tensions and long-standing flash points in Taiwan and the Korean

peninsula will require continuing careful management.”

The report said mishandling tensions between Taiwan and China could have “disastrous consequences for the region.”

The United States and Japan are stepping up efforts to build a joint missile defense system in Asia, partly as a bulwark against regional threats such as a nuclear-armed

North Korea. Australia, a steadfast U.S. ally that has about 2,000 troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, is studying whether to participate in the defense shield.

Australia and Japan signed a security agreement in March that will enable Japanese forces to train alongside Australians for disaster relief and peacekeeping missions,

and boost cooperation between the two countries in counterterrorism measures and intelligence sharing.

Japan Makes Missile Defense Shield a Priority

Japan Makes Missile Defense Shield a Priority

Japan said July 6 it aims to erect a missile defense shield as quickly as possible as North Korea develops increasingly sophisticated weaponry, including long-range rockets.
Japan’s annual defense report warned that North Korea is improving its missile system to cover all of East Asia, including Japan, and potentially reach the northern tip of Australia, as well as part of Alaska.
The report, approved by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s cabinet, was the first published by the defense ministry, which was upgraded from agency status in January in line with Abe’s initiative to expand the role of Japanese troops.
North Korea’s ballistic missiles “are now regarded as more practical,” the report said.
“North Korea is improving its capability of managing ballistic missiles. It is considered that North Korea is trying to further extend their firing range.
“It is necessary to finish deploying a ballistic missile defense as quickly as possible,” the annual paper said, noting the need for Tokyo to strengthen cooperation with the U.S. military.
The defense report comes after a series of North Korean missile launches that have heightened tensions in the region.
In 1998, North Korea sparked alarm in Japan by test-firing a long-range missile over the country, prompting Japan and the U.S. to start working on an advanced missile shield.
North Korea also shocked Japan with its first nuclear test last October.
Hopes are rising that a long-stalled pact on North Korea’s nuclear program will finally be realized, with the communist state hinting that it is ready to meet its promise to close a nuclear reactor.
While there is a chance that the reclusive state will take action to freeze its nuclear program, it is expected to continue developing missiles, a direct threat to South Korea and Japan, independent analysts said.
“Talks on nuclear weapons appear to move forward, but there is no progress in missiles at all,” said Masao Okonogi, professor of international politics at Keio University and an expert on the North Korean issue.
“Security in northeast Asia will remain fragile for the time being, centered on North Korea’s missile development,” Okonogi said.
Japan has set aside $1.3 billion on development and deployment of its missile defense for the current fiscal year to March 2008, up 4.4 percent from the previous fiscal year.
“While the entire defense budget has declined, we are spending our budget on what we have to spend, and the missile defense is the one,” said Mamoru Koutaki, press secretary of the defense ministry.
In March, Japan installed two Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) surface-to-air interceptors at the Iruma Air Self-Defence Force base in suburban Tokyo.
The U.S. installed Japan’s first anti-missile system on the southern island of Okinawa last year.
The ministry plans to deploy the U.S.-developed PAC-3s, which can cover a 12-mile radius, at a total of 11 bases in eastern and western Japan by March 2011.
Independent experts agree North Korea is also upgrading its missile technology.
“North Korea has improved the capability of missiles by receiving technology from other countries,” said Hideshi Takesada, professor at the National Institute for Defense. “Military tensions in northeast Asia are much higher than in the past. The race for development and deployment of missiles is a global trend and northeast Asia is no exception.”

Russia Threatens European Rocket Deployment

Russia Threatens European Rocket Deployment

Russia issued a veiled threat Wednesday to deploy rockets in its Kaliningrad enclave bordering the European Union if the United States builds a missile defense shield in Eastern Europe.
The two sides are locked in a standoff over the U.S. plans for a radar station in the Czech Republic and interceptor rockets in Poland. Russia says it is a threat to its security.
The threat to put missiles in Kalingrad was made by First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov only two days after Russian President Vladimir Putin again raised the missile shield dispute with U.S. President George W. Bush.
Putin has suggested to Bush that the United States use a Russian-controlled radar in ex-Soviet Azerbaijan, near the Iranian border instead of having a shield in Eastern Europe.
Putin has also offered the use of an early warning station under construction in southern Russia.
“If our offers are accepted, Russia will not consider it necessary to deploy new rocket units in the European part of the country, including Kaliningrad, to counter the threat” from the U.S. plans, Ivanov was quoted as saying by Russian news agencies.
Ivanov, who was on a visit to Uzbekistan, said Russia had “found an asymmetrical and effective response” to the U.S. project for a European shield.
“We know what we’re doing … If our proposals are not accepted, we will take adequate measures,” Ivanov said.
Washington insists its shield is to guard against possible attack from “rogue states” such as Iran. Moscow believes the systems are directed against Russia.
Ivanov’s comments suggested that tensions remain high despite efforts to calm the atmosphere at a meeting between Putin and Bush in Kennebunkport, Maine, this week.
Putin has already suggested that Russia could point its missiles at European targets if the U.S. plan goes ahead.
Kaliningrad, which Russia won at the end of World War II, lies on the Baltic Sea, separated from the rest of Russia by Poland and Lithuania.
Responding to Ivanov’s comments, Moscow-based defense analyst Pavel Felgenhauer said Russia in fact had no missiles of a range that could be fired from Kaliningrad and hit the proposed interceptors in Poland.
“It’s a threat aimed at the Polish people” designed to encourage them to protest against the U.S. plans, Felgenhauer said. “It’s an empty threat.”
NATO has backed the U.S. plan for a missile shield in Europe.

Thai Military Draws Fire for Post-Coup Budget Hike

Thai Military Draws Fire for Post-Coup Budget Hike

Thailand’s army-appointed parliament on July 4 debated a 24 percent military spending hike, which has raised questions about the motives of the generals who launched last year’s coup against Thaksin Shinawatra. The 28 billion baht hike in the 2007/08 defense budget, certain to be approved, to 143 billion baht ($4.5 billion) capped a similar increase for this year — a combined 66 percent rise since the military ousted Thaksin as prime minister in September.
At the time, the generals cited “rampant corruption” under the billionaire telecommunications tycoon as the main reason for launching Thailand’s 18th coup in 75 years of on-off democracy.
Surayud Chulanont, the former army chief appointed prime minister after the coup, gave no reasons for the hike other than a passing allusion to the 3-year insurgency in the Muslim-majority far south in which 2,300 people have been killed.
The government would “raise the efficiency of intelligence and operations” and “integrate efforts of resolving security problems in border provinces in the south to boost public trust in government security enforcement,” Surayud said.
Analysts said the increases at a time of slowing economic growth could come back to haunt the army, squeezed by civilian governments since its attempt to install a general as prime minister after a 1991 coup ended in mass riots and bloodshed.
“The military was in disgrace throughout the 1990s,” said political analyst Thitinan Pongsudhirak of Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University.
“They’ve suffered as an institution financially and now they are making up for lost time.”
Abhist Vejajiva, head of the former opposition Democrat Party, said the military “should be careful because this raises suspicions.”
Others said the armed forces could even be building up a war-chest for a run at politics after elections scheduled for November or December.
SCANDALS BREWING
“The military and the government it appointed should know there is strong suspicion across the country that the generals are padding the military budget for no other reason than because they can,” the Bangkok Post said in a recent editorial.
“There are many unanswered questions about whether the military is making essential purchases or acquiring more means to cling to power.”
The budget is not the only area in which the Council for National Security (CNS), as the coup command calls itself, is coming under scrutiny.
Saprang Kalayanamitr, a CNS general appointed chairman of state-owned telephone company TOT after the coup, was roundly criticized in the Thai media for ordering the firm to pay for 800 million baht of unspecified telecoms kit wanted by the army.
When TOT president Vuthiphong Preibjrivat refused to pay the money, Saprang fired him and appointed a colonel as his successor. TOT has since approved the deal.
Anti-coup campaigners are also furious about a clause in the new constitution being drawn up by an army-appointed council that enshrines the army’s right to receive adequate “military forces, weapons, ammunition, military equipment and technology”.
Although there has been little in the way of public outrage, analysts say the combination of scandals, constitution and budget could eventually crystallize serious opposition to army rule, as happened in 1991-92.
“There’s no immediate moral outrage, but I think that it is creeping in,” Thitinan said. “This sort of thing is certainly raising the stakes for the army because long term they are generating more and more opponents.”